28 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
28 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
# Divya — Week 3 Summary
|
|
|
|
## Tasks Completed
|
|
- Task 1: Material Variant Stress Test (Red/Blue/Yellow)
|
|
- Task 2: Texture Persistence Audit (Sun/Moon/Earth/Jupiter)
|
|
- Task 3: Geometric Stability Audit (Sphere/Cube/Cylinder/Plane)
|
|
- Task 4: Multi-Object Logic Audit (Sphere/Cube/Torus)
|
|
|
|
## Strongest Product Flow In Thob
|
|
- **State Determinism**: Even under high-frequency interaction, Thob never "loses" the state of a material. The 3D viewport is perfectly in sync with the logic layer during configuration.
|
|
|
|
## Weakest / Most Awkward Product Flow In Thob
|
|
- **Scaling Logic**: Managing multi-object mutual exclusivity (Single-select) is currently a manual nightmare. The lack of a "Selection Group" primitive is a major friction point.
|
|
|
|
## Top 2 High-Value Discoveries
|
|
- 1. The **Cylinder Crash**: A reproducible hard-crash specifically for cylinder hiding/visibility.
|
|
- 2. The **Refresh Reset**: Discovering that selecting variants does not yet persist across browser refreshes in the editor.
|
|
|
|
## Top 1 Quick Win Recommendation
|
|
- Introduce a **"Selection Group"** logic node that handles "Single Select" behavior automagically for any mesh attached to it.
|
|
|
|
## Top 1 Deeper Architecture Concern
|
|
- **Session Persistence**: The reset-on-refresh behavior indicates that active variant states are lost from the editor's memory pool during navigation or refreshes.
|
|
|
|
## If A Customer Wanted A Complex 3D Configurator, Could Thob Support It Well?
|
|
- **PARTIAL**
|
|
- Why: While Thob is 100% reliable for simple 3-4 option configurators, the manual logic-linking for complex, multi-part selection (50+ parts) is too fragile and prone to "State Explosion" in its current form.
|