31 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
31 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Consistency Audit Report: Week 3 Task 3 - UI ↔ 3D State
|
|
|
|
## Objective
|
|
Benchmark the synchronization integrity between the 2D UI components and the 3D scene state under stress.
|
|
|
|
## Audit Test Cases & Results
|
|
- **Click Order (A->B->C)**: [PASS] States transition correctly in any sequence.
|
|
- **Re-select Same Option**: [PASS] No state flickering or double-trigger issues.
|
|
- **Rapid Switching**: [PASS] High visual consistency maintained.
|
|
- **Default Reset**: [PASS] Successfully restores initial project state.
|
|
|
|
## Observations
|
|
- **State Drift**: 0% drift. The system is deterministic.
|
|
- **State Ownership**: Non-obvious. Requires "Property Hunting" in the sidebar to understand which UI button is controlling which mesh.
|
|
- **Scalability**: High for single-option configuration.
|
|
|
|
## Classification
|
|
- **Schema / Data Model**: Highly Reliable.
|
|
- **Editor UX**: Obscure (No visual connection between UI and 3D logic).
|
|
- **Runtime Issue**: Critical (Reproducible Cylinder Geometry crash).
|
|
|
|
## Reliability Verdict
|
|
**PARTIALLY RELIABLE / FRAGILE**
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Product Lens
|
|
- **Is this pattern useful for real customers?**: Yes. This is the "Industry Standard" for web-based 3D configurators.
|
|
- **Does Thob feel strong enough for this use case?**: Yes. The runtime stability is excellent.
|
|
- **What would improve the experience?**: A "Logic Connections" graph view to visualize state ownership.
|