docs: update week2 task2 docs
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf2f0f6cdd
commit
e47831aaec
@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
|
||||
- Feature comparison scenes with predefined arrangements.
|
||||
- Presentation flows where one click changes scene composition and framing.
|
||||
- Does Thob feel strong enough for this use case?
|
||||
- Partial. The pattern is possible by combining object visibility states and Perspective Camera positions, but button-triggered updates are not reliably synchronized.
|
||||
- Partial. The pattern is possible by combining object visibility states and Perspective Camera positions, but my first instinct was button-based one-click switching and that did not work reliably end-to-end.
|
||||
- A practical fallback is radio-button switching across preconfigured scene-state combinations.
|
||||
- What would improve the experience?
|
||||
- One button should update all linked properties simultaneously, or fast enough that transitions feel instant.
|
||||
- Better multi-target binding UX for visibility, transforms, and camera props.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -32,8 +32,10 @@ Switch between predefined scene states where each state controls object visibili
|
||||
-Possible: Partial
|
||||
-Notes:
|
||||
- We can make things like this by creating combinations of object visibility and Perspective Camera position, but the button issue persists.
|
||||
- My first intuition was to use buttons for one-click state switching, but I could not make that setup reliably work end-to-end.
|
||||
- We should be able to click the button and it all should be simultaneously or fast enough to not notice.
|
||||
- Current button flow is not reliable enough for multi-property state switching.
|
||||
- A practical fallback is using radio buttons to switch between preconfigured scene-state combinations.
|
||||
-Builder steps:
|
||||
- Create scene objects and define visibility combinations.
|
||||
- Set Perspective Camera positions for each target state.
|
||||
@ -66,8 +68,8 @@ Switch between predefined scene states where each state controls object visibili
|
||||
-Is there a workaround?
|
||||
- Partial workaround.
|
||||
-If yes, what is it?
|
||||
- Manually set visibility and camera values in sequence.
|
||||
- Use simpler, fewer state transitions to reduce button binding complexity.
|
||||
- Use radio buttons to switch between preconfigured scene-state combinations (visibility + transform + camera presets).
|
||||
- Keep transitions simpler/fewer to reduce binding instability and improve repeatability.
|
||||
|
||||
## Suggested Improvement
|
||||
-What should improve in Thob?
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
||||
## Thob Observations from Task Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- **Possible:** Partial
|
||||
- **Implementation used:** Combinations of object visibility states and Perspective Camera positions, with button-based switching attempts.
|
||||
- **Implementation used:** Combinations of object visibility states and Perspective Camera positions; first intuition was button-based one-click switching, but it was not reliable end-to-end.
|
||||
- **What worked as expected:**
|
||||
- Visibility states can be configured for multiple objects.
|
||||
- Camera position presets can be prepared for different scene views.
|
||||
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
|
||||
5. Validate whether transitions are synchronized and repeatable.
|
||||
- **Complexity:** Hard
|
||||
- **Main limitation signals:** Editor UX + Event system + Runtime stability concerns.
|
||||
- **Workaround status:** Partial workaround only (manual or simplified transitions; full one-click synchronized switching is not dependable yet).
|
||||
- **Workaround status:** Partial workaround only (use radio buttons to switch preconfigured scene-state combinations, and keep transitions simpler while full one-click synchronized switching remains unstable).
|
||||
|
||||
## Console Warnings/Errors Seen (Deduplicated) and Probable Meaning
|
||||
|
||||
@ -73,5 +73,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
- Task 2 concept is achievable in thob at a basic level: visibility and camera state combinations can be authored.
|
||||
- The key product gap is synchronized execution: one button should apply all linked updates simultaneously, but current binding behavior is not reliably atomic.
|
||||
- A practical fallback is radio-button-driven switching between preconfigured state combinations.
|
||||
- Recurring duplicate-registration warnings strongly match the interaction issues seen during multi-prop button setup.
|
||||
- Improving binding lifecycle stability and one-click bundled updates should be the highest priority for this task pattern.
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user