Docs: task1 notes
This commit is contained in:
parent
4310263170
commit
af093fa87a
@ -1,5 +1,12 @@
|
||||
## Product Lens
|
||||
- Is this pattern useful for real customers? Yes / Partial / No
|
||||
- Is this pattern useful for real customers? Yes
|
||||
- What kind of customer use case does this support?
|
||||
- 3D product viewers where users switch between front/side/detail viewpoints.
|
||||
- Architecture/interior previews with predefined camera tour angles.
|
||||
- Marketing/storytelling scenes that need guided perspective changes.
|
||||
- Does Thob feel strong enough for this use case?
|
||||
- Partial. The base setup works (Perspective Camera + Make Default), but interaction wiring for button-driven camera behavior is still hard to discover and execute.
|
||||
- What would improve the experience?
|
||||
- Improve Make Default button UX.
|
||||
- Make button-to-component-prop binding easier and more intuitive.
|
||||
- Add a clearer interaction flow: choose button -> choose target component -> choose prop -> choose value/preset.
|
||||
@ -1,60 +1,90 @@
|
||||
# Task: [Feature Name]
|
||||
# Task: Camera Preset Switching (Front / Side / Top Angled)
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
What is the feature trying to do?
|
||||
Switch the camera between predefined viewpoints and smoothly transition between them using UI buttons (and optional keyboard shortcuts).
|
||||
|
||||
## Vanilla three.js
|
||||
-Possible: Yes / Partial / No
|
||||
-Possible: Yes
|
||||
-Notes:
|
||||
- Uses `THREE.PerspectiveCamera` with three named presets (`front`, `side`, `topAngled`).
|
||||
- Buttons and keyboard input update a `desiredPosition` vector.
|
||||
- Camera movement is smoothed each frame using `camera.position.lerp(...)`.
|
||||
-Key concepts:
|
||||
-Complexity: Easy / Medium / Hard
|
||||
- Perspective camera setup
|
||||
- Preset position mapping
|
||||
- Input events for switching views
|
||||
- Frame-loop interpolation
|
||||
-Complexity: Medium
|
||||
|
||||
## R3F
|
||||
-Possible: Yes / Partial / No
|
||||
-Possible: Yes
|
||||
-Notes:
|
||||
- Uses React state (`preset`) for active camera view.
|
||||
- `CameraController` reads R3F camera with `useThree()` and updates it in `useFrame()`.
|
||||
- Buttons and key events only update state; camera logic stays isolated in one controller component.
|
||||
-What R3F abstracted:
|
||||
-Complexity: Easy / Medium / Hard
|
||||
- Render loop management via `useFrame`
|
||||
- Camera access inside scene graph via hooks
|
||||
- Cleaner state-driven UI-to-camera flow
|
||||
-Complexity: Easy
|
||||
|
||||
## Thob Page Builder
|
||||
-Possible: Yes / Partial / No
|
||||
-Possible: Partial
|
||||
-Notes:
|
||||
- We can create the same result by using the Perspective Camera component and toggling the Make Default button.
|
||||
- Current button UX needs improvement.
|
||||
- It should be easier and more intuitive to connect a button and change target component prop values.
|
||||
- I could not clearly figure out how to make the button functional end-to-end.
|
||||
-Builder steps:
|
||||
-Complexity: Easy / Medium / Hard
|
||||
- Add a Perspective Camera component.
|
||||
- Toggle Make Default on the camera.
|
||||
- Try wiring UI button actions to camera property changes/preset values.
|
||||
-Complexity: Hard
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison Summary
|
||||
-Possible in all 3? Yes / Partial / No
|
||||
-Possible in all 3? Partial
|
||||
-Main differences:
|
||||
- Vanilla gives full control but needs more manual wiring.
|
||||
- R3F gives a clean state-driven structure with less boilerplate.
|
||||
- Thob is visually fast for setup but action-to-prop wiring is not intuitive yet.
|
||||
-Where Thob is better:
|
||||
- Faster visual setup for camera and scene without coding everything.
|
||||
-Where Thob is weaker:
|
||||
- Button interaction flow and property binding discoverability.
|
||||
-What feels awkward or unclear:
|
||||
- How to connect button actions directly to camera props/presets in a reliable way.
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitation Type (if any)
|
||||
-[ ] Editor UX limitation
|
||||
-[x] Editor UX limitation
|
||||
-[ ] Runtime limitation
|
||||
-[ ] Schema / data model limitation
|
||||
-[ ] Component limitation
|
||||
-[ ] Event system limitation
|
||||
-[x] Event system limitation
|
||||
-[ ] Asset pipeline limitation
|
||||
-[ ] Unknown / needs investigation
|
||||
|
||||
## Workaround
|
||||
-Is there a workaround?
|
||||
- Partial workaround.
|
||||
-If yes, what is it?
|
||||
- Use Perspective Camera + Make Default for a static/default view.
|
||||
- For advanced preset switching behavior, implement custom logic outside the current builder button flow.
|
||||
|
||||
## Suggested Improvement
|
||||
-What should improve in Thob?
|
||||
- Improve Make Default button UX and action binding flow.
|
||||
- Let buttons connect to component props more directly and transparently.
|
||||
- Add a clearer UI for selecting target component, target prop, and value per interaction.
|
||||
-Is it:
|
||||
-editor
|
||||
-runtime
|
||||
-component
|
||||
-UX
|
||||
-schema/data
|
||||
- editor
|
||||
- UX
|
||||
- component
|
||||
|
||||
## Difficulty Estimate
|
||||
-Easy / Medium / Hard
|
||||
-Medium
|
||||
|
||||
## Business Value
|
||||
-Low / Medium / High
|
||||
-High
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendation
|
||||
Should Thob support this better? Why?
|
||||
Yes, Thob should support this better because camera presets are common in product demos, configurators, and storytelling scenes. Easier camera-control UX would reduce setup time and increase confidence for non-code users.
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user